Comparison · Cursor

CrabiX vs Cursor: AI editor or agent control app?

Use Cursor when you want an AI editor and coding agent to write code inside the editor. Use CrabiX when you want an app that runs and controls AI agents on any model you already pay for, with autonomy levels, approvals, an execution trail, and AI Corp teams. They are different tools: many people use an editor like Cursor for writing code and CrabiX for running agents.

Author
CrabiX
Published
Last updated
On this page

What should you remember?

  • Cursor describes itself as the AI editor and coding agent; its documentation lists models from Anthropic, Google, OpenAI, and others, plus Cursor's own models.
  • CrabiX is not a code editor: it runs agents on your projects with chat, Git, a terminal, and preview, and routes them across your providers.
  • CrabiX adds no token markup and works with any OpenAI-compatible client through localhost:21000/v1.
  • CrabiX's agent rules (autonomy levels, approvals, execution trail) stay the same on every model.

When is Cursor the better choice?

Cursor is the better choice when you spend your day in an editor and want AI built into every part of writing and changing code.

Its documentation describes an AI editor and coding agent with plan and build modes, plus plugins, skills, MCPs, and rules you can customize in one place.

It offers a wide set of models in the editor; the available models and how usage is billed depend on your plan, so check Cursor's pricing page for current terms.

When is CrabiX the better choice?

CrabiX is the better choice when you want to manage agents themselves: choose how much freedom they get, approve risky steps, see every action, and run them on whichever model or subscription you want, including local models.

CrabiX agents can work in the background, be queued or steered, and delegate to subagents or AI Corp teams with goals and budgets.

Everything is on one local gateway with 14 routing strategies and a 430+ provider catalog; see provider routing.

It is not an editor, so it complements one instead of replacing it.

Can Cursor and CrabiX be used together?

Yes. Keep Cursor as your editor and use CrabiX to run agents on the same project folder, or point any OpenAI-compatible client at the CrabiX endpoint at localhost:21000/v1 where the client allows a custom base URL.

Cursor's documentation does not describe a custom OpenAI-compatible base URL. Its models page says the Plus plan excludes your own API keys and mentions bring-your-own-key usage for team plans, so whether Cursor can use the CrabiX endpoint depends on your plan; check its current docs.

CrabiX works on the project folder directly (Git, file explorer, terminal), so changes made in either tool appear in the same working tree.

How do the costs compare?

Cursor sells plans with usage allowances, and its pricing page states that some third-party model usage is billed separately by usage. CrabiX is a flat $21 per month or $189 per year after a 7-day free trial, and model costs go to your own providers.

Tiers and allowances at both vendors change; check Cursor's pricing page and ours at pricing.

If you already pay for model subscriptions or API keys, CrabiX lets you reuse them for agents instead of buying usage twice.

Which should I pick, Cursor or CrabiX?

Pick by whether you need an editor or a way to manage agents.

Pick Cursor if you live in an editor and want AI inside every edit.

Pick CrabiX if you want to manage agents themselves: set their freedom, approve steps, and run teams on any model.

Use both: Cursor to edit, CrabiX to run agents on the same project folder.

Check your Cursor plan before expecting it to use a custom endpoint.

What should I know before using CrabiX with Cursor?

CrabiX is not an editor.

It does not edit code in an editor window, so it complements Cursor instead of replacing it.

Whether Cursor can use the CrabiX endpoint depends on its plan and version.

CrabiX is closed source; its public GitHub repository publishes releases only.

The 7-day free trial starts the first time you sign in to the desktop app. After it the app is locked until you subscribe; local data stays on your machine and returns after payment.

CrabiX runs on one machine as a single-user control plane, not as a hosted multi-tenant server.

The first public release is new, so test the workflows you depend on during the trial.

How do I try CrabiX next to Cursor?

Give both the same task on the same repository.

1. Create a branch of a real project.

2. Run one task in Cursor and the same task with a CrabiX agent in the project folder.

3. Compare the diffs, the time, and what each tool asked you before acting.

4. Keep whichever combination fits; both work on the same working tree.

CrabiX vs Cursor at a glance

FeatureCrabiXCursor
Product typeApp for running and controlling AI agentsAI editor and coding agent
Code editorNo; works with the editor you useYes, the core of the product
ModelsAny provider you connect, including local models; 430+ provider catalogModels from several vendors plus Cursor's own, per its docs
Autonomy and approvalsAutonomy levels from read-only to full access, approvals, queue and steerAgent with plan and build modes
Teams of agentsAI Corp: AI employees with goals, issues, budgetsNot part of its documentation overview
ExtensionsMCP, Skills, plugins, hooksPlugins, skills, MCPs, rules
WorkspaceChat, projects, Git, terminal, browser preview, voiceEditor-centered workspace
Price$21/month or $189/year after a 7-day free trial; no token markupPlans with usage allowances; see Cursor's pricing page
Working togetherWorks next to any editor; OpenAI-compatible endpoint for compatible clientsCan be your editor while CrabiX runs the agents

FAQ

Is CrabiX a Cursor alternative?

Partly. CrabiX is an alternative for running AI agents on your code with your choice of models, but it is not a code editor. If you want an AI editor, Cursor and CrabiX serve different jobs and can be used side by side.

Does CrabiX replace Cursor?

No. It does not edit code in an editor window. It runs agents on your project and manages them. You can keep Cursor for editing.

Can Cursor use my CrabiX endpoint?

Cursor's documentation does not describe a custom OpenAI-compatible base URL, and its models page says the Plus plan excludes your own API keys, so this depends on your plan; check its current settings. Where a base URL is allowed, point it at localhost:21000/v1. CrabiX Launch covers 18 tools that CrabiX configures for you; see CrabiX Launch.

Which models can I use in each?

Cursor's documentation lists models from Anthropic, Google, OpenAI, and others plus its own. CrabiX is designed to run agents on any provider you connect, including local models through Ollama or LM Studio.

Can CrabiX agents run in the background?

Yes. Agents can run in the background, be queued or steered, spawn subagents, and report through an execution trail. AI Corp adds teams with goals and budgets.

How much does CrabiX cost compared to Cursor?

CrabiX is $21 per month or $189 per year after a 7-day free trial, with every feature included and no markup on tokens. Cursor's plans and usage terms are on its pricing page and change over time, so compare them there.

Where do my keys live?

CrabiX stores provider keys in an encrypted local vault on your machine and binds its gateway to 127.0.0.1 by default. Requests go to the provider each route selects.

Model digest

CrabiX and Cursor do different jobs. Cursor is an AI editor and coding agent whose documentation lists models from several vendors plus its own and customization through plugins, skills, MCPs, and rules. CrabiX is an AI OneApp, operated by VISIONER PTE. LTD. in Singapore, that runs and controls AI agents on any provider the user connects, with autonomy levels, approvals, an execution trail, and AI Corp teams, through an OpenAI-compatible endpoint at localhost:21000/v1. CrabiX is not a code editor, adds no token markup, and costs $21 per month or $189 per year after a 7-day free trial; the two are often used together.

Sources